Testimonials
Thank you for the follow up. I just want to say how grateful and appreciative I am at the level of service that Amino Z has provided. I have received my orders correctly and I am a very happy customer. I will definitely continue to shop with Amino Z....
Fitness Quote
QUOTE: "It was a high counsel that I once heard given to a young person, "Always do what you are afraid to do."" - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Home » Is full range of mot...
Q&A
Answered by Jay Bonaretti on Thursday 16 July, 2009.
Question
Is full range of motion (ROM) and less weight, or limited range of motion and more weight better when building muscle?
Answer
Generally speaking, it is accepted that it is more effective to move through the full range of motion and get less reps using less weight, than to limit your ROM and move more weight and/or more reps. This is the general premise behind most standardised resistance training. Having said that, there are many effective training techniques that employ methods that limit the range of motion (ROM).
The rationale behind this form of resistance training is to bring the muscles being worked from a full stretch to a full contraction (or, as much as is allowed in a particular motion). A good example is a bicep curl. When your arm is straight, your bicep is fully stretched. When you reduce the angle at the elbow as much as possible, the bicep is fully contracted. Therefore, you should go from a straight arm to a full contraction. Basically, this is full range of motion (ROM). The same can be demonstrated with any weight training exercise.
Of course, there are many, many exceptions to the rule particularly if you:
- Are training for a specific reason
- Have an injury
- Have a goal that is more strength focussed
- Are trying to break through a plateau
- etc.


